AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE IN THE VORTEX OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST: A FORTRESS OF DEFENSE OR A MERE ILLUSION OF COMPLIANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62281/dsqnaa68Keywords:
Auditor Independence, Conflict of Interest, Audit Tenure, Non-Audit Services, Client ImportanceAbstract
Auditor independence is the cornerstone of financial reporting integrity, yet its position is frequently threatened by conflicting interests. This study aims to map how auditor independence stands as a "fortress of defense" or conversely dissolves into a mere "illusion of compliance" within a whirlpool of conflict of interest. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method on 25 global research articles from the 2021–2026 period, this study analyzes various variables affecting auditor objectivity. The mapping results indicate that independence can become a sturdy fortress when supported by personal integrity, audit staff satisfaction, and the oversight of expert audit committees. In contrast, independence tends to become an illusion when auditors are trapped by firm economic pressures, non-audit service dependence, as well as social and geographical biases. These findings provide a theoretical contribution regarding the importance of synergy between formal regulation and the strengthening of intrinsic motivation to safeguard the dignity of the auditing profession in the future.
Downloads
References
Abouelela, O., Diab, A., & Saleh, S. (2025). The determinants of the relationship between auditor tenure and audit report lag: evidence from an emerging market. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2444553
Bala, H., Ahmad, W., Kathoon, G., & Karaye, A. B. (2022). Audit firm attributes and income smoothing: the moderating influence of audit committee accounting expertise. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2127194
Carey, P., Eierle, B., & Hartlieb, S. (2025). Audit Staff Satisfaction and Audit Quality: Evidence from the Private Client Market Segment. European Accounting Review, 34(3), 1029–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2024.2321344
Chen, J. Z., Elemes, A., & Lobo, G. J. (2023). David versus Goliath: The Relation between Auditor Size and Audit Quality for U.K. Private Firms. European Accounting Review, 32(2), 447–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1986090
Das, A., Chong, V. K., Masschelein, S., Wang, I. Z., & Woodliff, D. R. (2025). The effects of performance-based profit-sharing schemes and client pressure on auditors’ pre-negotiation judgments. Advances in Accounting, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2024.100781
Downar, B., Ernstberger, J., & Koch, C. (2021). Who makes partner in Big 4 audit firms? – Evidence from Germany. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101176
Dunne, N. J., Brennan, N. M., & Kirwan, C. E. (2023). How the Big Four maintain and defend logic equilibrium at concurrent performances. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102479
Dunne, N. J., Brennan, N. M., & Kirwan, C. E. (2025). Uncovering the nature of framing: The Big Four audit firms versus a competition regulator. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102822
Elkelani, S., Salama, F. M., Al-Nasser Abdallah, A., Gleason, K., & Alotaibi, E. M. (2026). The effect of auditor characteristics on the quality of segment disclosures of diversified firms. International Review of Economics and Finance, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2026.104984
Johri, A., & Singh, R. K. (2024). A systematic literature review of Auditing Practices research landscape and future research propositions using bibliometric analysis. In Cogent Business and Management (Vol. 11, Number 1). Cogent OA. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2344743
Khalil, U. F. (2022). Auditor choice and its impact on financial reporting quality: A case of banking industry of Pakistan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(4), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.12.001
Khurana, I. K., Li, B., Yeung, K., & Yu, E. J. (2026). Audit partners’ cultural trust and audit outcomes. Journal of Accounting and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2026.101872
Li, W., Li, T., & Zhu, H. (2025). Annual report audit, ESG report assurance and audit quality: Evidence from the same accounting firm. China Journal of Accounting Research, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100434
Mansur, H., Abdul Rahman, A. A., Meero, A., & Shatnawi, A. (2022). The perceptions of external auditors on the relationship between audit fees and audit quality. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2113203
McKenna, F., Pevzner, M., Sheneman, A. G., & Zach, T. (2025). Audit quality in the face of a crisis: Evidence from the audit inspection scandal. British Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101729
Mescall, D., & Schmidt, R. N. (2025). The impact of joint provision of audit and tax services on the advice of tax professionals. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2025.107293
Nurhidayah, N., Sudarma, M., Djamhuri, A., & Atmini, S. (2024). Audit opinion research: overview and research agenda. In Cogent Business and Management (Vol. 11, Number 1). Cogent OA. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2301134
Ocak, M., Kablan, A., & Dursun, G. D. (2021). Does auditing multiple clients affiliated with the same business group reduce audit quality? Evidence from an emerging market. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.06.001
Perry, Y. K. Z., Adrian, C., Hu, F., & Truong, C. (2024). Natural disasters and audit fees. Accounting and Business Research, 54(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2023.2181752
Qiao, C., Zheng, G., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Can industry information disclosure improve audit quality? China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100327
Quick, R., Sánchez Toledano, D., & Sánchez Toledano, J. (2024). Measures for enhancing auditor independence: Perceptions of spanish non-professional investors and auditors. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2024.100250
Rahaman, M. M., & Karim, M. R. (2023). How do board features and auditor characteristics shape key audit matters disclosures? Evidence from emerging economies. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100331
Yu, D., Sun, Z., Lu, J., & Yang, L. (2026). IPO audit contingent fees and earnings reversal. China Journal of Accounting Research, 19(2), 100465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100465
Yuan, S., Zhang, W., & Zhu, K. (2023). Place attachment, audit pricing and audit quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100365
Zhao, P., Liu, Y., & Shi, J. (2025). One’s name represents oneself: Auditor’s given names and audit quality. International Review of Economics and Finance, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104617
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahmad Haqqi, Yusnaini Yusnaini (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
