ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF CROWN WITNESSES IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62281/v2i2.196Kata Kunci:
Crown Witness, Criminal Cases, EvidenceAbstrak
Witnesses are quite important pieces of evidence in a criminal case examination. This is because a description of criminal events in the past can be revealed by a witness. In the event of a shortage of witnesses, in a crime committed by more than 1 (one) person, witnesses can be obtained from other defendants. Witnesses who are defendants in separate case files are referred to as crown witnesses. This article aims to determine the role and contribution of crown witnesses in criminal case examinations. The writing method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach. The results of this research are that the existence of crown witnesses and their role in evidence varies in each case or is casuistic. Crown witnesses are ideally used when there is a shortage of witnesses or the principle of unus testis nullus testis is not fulfilled.
Unduhan
Referensi
Amrullah, A. (2014). PARADIGMA SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAM PERSIDANGAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 2(2).
Febriani, N., Haryadi, H., & Rakhmawaty, D. (2021). Penggunaan Saksi Mahkota (Kroongetuige) dalam Pembuktian di Persidangan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i2.9614
Jonaedi Efendi dan Johnny Ibrahim. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum: normatif dan empiris / Jonaedi Efendi, Johnny Ibrahim. Kencana, 2(Hukum).
Pangaribuan, A. M. A., Mufti, A., & Zikry, I. (2017). Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.
Raja, D. L., Fauzi, A., & Sahari, A. (2023). Perlindungan Hak Tersangka Dalam Memberikan Keterangan Secara Bebas Pada Proses Penyidikan Di Kepolisian Sektor Medan Baru. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i2.340
Sonata, D. L. (2015). METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF DAN EMPIRIS: KARAKTERISTIK KHAS DARI METODE MENELITI HUKUM. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283
Sukadana, I. M., Amiruddin, A., & Parman, L. (2018). ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAM PERKARA PIDANA PENCURIAN. LAW REFORM, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i2.20873
Tabah, M. J. (2021). Kekuatan Pembuktian Berita Acara Pemeriksaan Saksi Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Persidangan. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i2.2240
Yanti, N. K. D., & Mertha, I. K. (2020). EKSISTENSI SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN ASAS NON SELF INCRIMINATION. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i12.p10
YUSMAN, Y. Y. (2019). SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN PERKARA (SPLITSING) DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v2i1.2984
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Itok kurniawan (Author)
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
